The second is much more interesting, the shapes are separated enough for it not to be cluttered and there are severals moments to focus on, the first does not have that. The first also uses the whole frame, from edge to edge.
first. there are only four different directions that people are looking. i don't even feel like counting how many directions are being looked in the second. however, the first doesn't look very busy to express the interest of events.
wow, I'm going to join the majority and say the first. When I saw the first, my first reaction was, how each one has a story. Although the second shows that too, I feel like there's more opportunity to tell it in the first. Possibly... They're both good either way :) which do you like?
6 comments:
I like the first one more. It feels less cluttered... Then again, sometimes clutter is the point.
Same. I like the first. I like the space and I like the interactions between the separated groups of people.
The second is much more interesting, the shapes are separated enough for it not to be cluttered and there are severals moments to focus on, the first does not have that. The first also uses the whole frame, from edge to edge.
the first one... the second seems too busy :)
first. there are only four different directions that people are looking. i don't even feel like counting how many directions are being looked in the second. however, the first doesn't look very busy to express the interest of events.
wow, I'm going to join the majority and say the first. When I saw the first, my first reaction was, how each one has a story. Although the second shows that too, I feel like there's more opportunity to tell it in the first. Possibly... They're both good either way :) which do you like?
Post a Comment